Showing posts with label 2005. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2005. Show all posts

Thursday, November 15, 2012

A Clarifying Aspect of the Recreation of Nature: Sense of Peychwen’s Artificial Nature

A Clarifying Aspect pf the Recreation of Nature
By Luchia Lee / Ken Howell
No matter how many principles or theories of art have been declared, the fact remains that art is a product of reaction. It can simply present the zeitgeist of its time, but most often is a reaction against the times or against art that has preceded it. Art history seemingly is a smooth development. But in fact as Herbert declared, art is not progressive. The reaction involved in producing individual pieces of art depends on individuals and circumstances. Real art is not transitory like the news, but deeply original. Only through an awareness of history and long term sensitivity to experience can the artist be led toward self-realization. Since self demolition is necessary, the process of creation can never be in balance, and is always rocking and changing. An aggressive method and decisive mind is a secure way to define the element to form the final solid object that is presented to us.
Peychwen’s “Artificial Nature” series takes a strong underlying idea – namely, reaction against the degradation of nature by humans - and transforms it into a soft, beautiful, diffused image.
Peychwen’s work directly announces the new technology with its attractive new image created by humans. Some people object to this new order and rail against it as a fake world; they prefer a more literary way to describe the multitude of senseless ways in which humans corrupt their environment. The reality is that the world keeps moving and all of us must simply admit the changing nature of our milieu.
· Industrial revolution and technological advancement in the past 200 years have yielded astounding improvements in living standards. Yet just in the 20th century, the number of people afflicted by depression-related disease has grown by a factor of one hundred.
· In the past 200 years, over 100 million people have died in war, more than the total of previous such tolls in human history.
· Global warming, caused by rampant expansion of capitalism and consumerism, is changing Earth’s climate at catastrophic rates.
· And in the meantime, poverty is ravaging more and more countries as the world migrates to a 20/80 society where 80% of wealth will be controlled by 20% of the people. Furthermore, world population continues to rise at rapid pace; it will reach 10 billion within the next 50 years.
All these fatal phenomena come from the blind pursuit of material possession and sensual satisfaction, because of a lack of understanding and appreciation of nature, and the role of humanity on Earth. Peychwen looks through these risks and reinterprets them. From these numerous threats, she chooses a subject, and then brings this subject to a visual realization. Since the vividness of original reality cannot be sacrificed, Peychwen uses regular geometrical shapes such as cylinders, rectangular solids, tetrahedra and spheres in her series of installations entitled “Artificial Nature”. The artist also makes increasing use of fluorescent light to define her works. As Paul Cezanne observed, “treat nature by means of the cylinder, the sphere, the cone, … [and] introduce into our light vibrations, represented by the reds and yellows, a sufficient amount of blueness to give the feel of air.” This kind of artistic originality imposes a manifold structured format on our visualizations. In forming a response to a piece of art, the viewer must take into account the data to be obtained from many perspectives.
Plato’s idea of mimesis is that in mimicking nature our goal should be to express images clearly, not influenced by our emotion or knowledge. In “Artificial Nature,” Peychwen’s interpretation of mimesis, we should not see an exaggeration or a fiction, but rather notice an artificial color, and a quiet, stable, and colorful object that stands beside or in a corner. Then, the atmosphere created by light under the glass reveals the works’ virtue and that of the artist. Because the light is insubstantial, it is spread out and confused; the color seems subtle and floats on the surface. The color, light, shape, and environment together create a bright unlimited perception, thus drawing us towards a point. In this series of works, she didn’t intend to construct any specific genre; her style is herself.
The structure of the universe surpasses human understanding. In contrast, our society was constructed by human reason. Thus, persons who do not have a higher spiritual level and do not respect the invisible world will not care about the value of the existence of human beings. In the Principle of Art, R.G. Collingwood clearly defined art reality and experience. It is rare in our world to mention that art should be prophetic. This means the artist can directly express the secrets of the mind; the secret does not represent him/her self, but the artist acts as a group speaker to articulate a secret. No group can completely know what really exists in their mind. Therefore, they cheat themselves and most of all us when doing research and observing. The lesson is ignorance equals death. There is only one way to redeem this ignorant guilt: art is healing medicine for sick spirits and rusty senses. The movement of modern art always involves destruction of a portion of the self. This contradicts the notion that this movement is simply a powerful influence for renewal.
Reflecting the artist’s religious consciousness and humanistic thoughts, Peychwen’s work expresses her prophetic and warning character. Through art, she achieves realization of her own mission, and contributes on a spiritual passionate level. Peychwen has direct, frank, transparent ideas, and a logical character, along with a keen, new awareness of the world. To understand the work we cannot ignore the background and life of the artist. Peychwen is characterized by consistency, strength of will, and mercy. She cares about human beings and nature. She always tries to find the possible from the impossible.
She mingles the methods of the literary and visual arts to express concept, and slyly arranges splendid colors. Indirectly, she questions our way of life, and the structure of society, from feminism to consumerism. Her collected works constitute a voyage through an illusive wonderland. Her kaleidoscopic images, composed of synthetic materials, seem natural and invite the viewer’s touch, but always prove to be untouchable.
Flower petals are delicately layered in Peychwen’s work to express the beauty and tenderness of flowers. She embeds them in translucent solids in a presentation of the feminine sense. Flowers always attempt seduction; they have long been used as a symbol for female issues. Artificial nature at first glance seems unrelated to female issue, but the relationship bears further analysis.
Peychwen has a long history of treating feminist subjects, frequently taking examples from Chinese history or culture. This may explain why she has chosen to employ flowers or leaves in her work. In Artificial Nature, her roses are composed of petals pillowed one upon the next, leading to a seductive and exotic result. These flowers are both free of restriction and calm. Yet, constructed as they are of synthetic materials and embedded in geometric objects, they are also unreal and alien.
Peychwen’s work depends not only on its visual aspect, but also on its position in space. In “Catching,” she does not give up color in order to solve the dimension problem. Instead, she arranges three-dimensional animations and projections to spotlight the piece. Thus she creates a space with dramatic light and many images of gliding a butterflies slowly moving their wings above lovely flower petals.
Although we know the scenario is unreal, we don’t trust this initial impression. Upon touching the image, we realize it is just an image - an illusion. But, we have already taken action. Thus, this work produces a sense of loss and becomes a test of human response. External chaos is simply a reflection of internal imbalance. This butterfly and flower metaphor probes appreciation of beauty and self-identification of the space. Those objects surrounding us are the operands of our senses. Measure in art takes the form of size, structure, line, color, and proportion. But in “Catching,” all these parameters guide us towards an illusion and not towards truth. Another perspective on “Catching” can be gained by viewing it from a corner of the space. When another viewer enters the darkened space, only his outline is distinctly visible because he is backlit. This is reminiscent of the situation with the butterfly images that all turned out to be insubstantial – with of course the ironic difference that these fellow audience members are quite real but difficult to perceive.
No matter how artificial or full of illusion, no matter how technological, Peychwen’s art always strives towards one goal – renewal of the spirit. This is vital to all civilizations, no matter their philosophy, politics, science, or governance. To present an emotionally clear sense image has never changed as the goal of the artist. Creative fertile imagination is a treasure, and will be the foundation for new civilizations.

再造一個自然的視野-林珮淳的「回歸大自然」系列



再造一個自然的視野-林珮淳的「回歸大自然」系列
                                                                                                                                                         綠可

不論有多少的藝術原則或者是藝術理論被不斷申明,藝術仍然是一種反應現實的物,他可以僅僅是對時間的感受,但多數是對時間的一種抵制,或是反對先例的;藝術史看起來僅僅是一種平順的發展延伸,但是藝術並不是呈現直線的進與發展,這一種反應參雜了個別作品創作時的個人及環境因素,真正的藝術並非如新聞事件般的短暫,而是更注重於深度的原創本質,只有經過史的察覺以及長時間敏的經驗及感受方能引發藝術家自覺,就因為藝術創造必須有自我的推翻及解構,並且不斷的改變及搖滾,是以過程決不會呈現一種平衡的態,所以最可靠的創作是以積極的方法及決定性的心去定義與組合這些過程中零散元素,並以最純粹物體最終呈現在我們面前。林珮淳的系列作品來自一個強烈的潛在觀念,她反應與抵制人類對於自然的降格,並且將這些觀念轉化成為一種從柔軟及美麗所擴散出來的影像。

她的作品直接的宣告了人類對新科技媒材的運用,她的作品顯現了這些新影像的魅力,或許有些人反對這一種新世紀的秩序,或責罵這種假象佔領我們的世界,他們比較願意以一種人性的法去大人類毀壞了環境,不論是如的來態,實際情形是世界仍然不斷的前發展,我們僅能去接受環境中自然的轉變及所來不合理在的事實,這一些轉變事實例如下:

工業的發展及新技術的發明在過去兩百年間,經明顯改了人類生活的品質,但是在二十世紀,憂鬱症相關病症的人數卻增加了一百倍
在過去兩百年間,有將的人戰爭遠超史紀
地球暖自於義及消費主義的猖獗經改變了地球氣候形浩劫機率
再這時,貧窮迫害了更多的家。有百分之八十財富掌握百分之二十
,世界人在一種急速增加中,將造成對人類生存威脅

所有的致命的現象來自於人類如盲目般的追求物質有,以及感受,並因為缺乏了解的智慧及一種感激之心,以及於理解人類在地球角色珮淳看出了這一種危機,並且有了極為強烈的慾望去解這一種現象,在這一些威脅中,她選擇了一個自然的主題,並將這一個主題轉化成一種視覺上具體的物體呈現,因為要保留這一種力的本質,她使用了幾何對比的形式
金字塔型、圓錐、長方體、圓體及體。人工燈光及媒材定義了非自然的藝術品,如同保羅 塞尚的觀察及再告解,將自然解圓錐、圓筒、圓球種的幾何形,所有的物體有正視比例,一個延伸一個相同的接觸點,這一種藝術的本質提供了一種視覺化的構,成一種體的藝術,就是觀者必須自不度去觀看並取得透視的訊號
另柏拉圖對於模仿的觀念,是要求清楚現自然模仿形式,而不被情緒知識所引。在珮淳的作品中, 出現一種幾何式的非自然,在解模仿自然的作品形式上,我們誇張或是多像去看這些作品,僅僅就這些人為的安靜、穩定的物體放置間中,這一些光製造出來的氣氛,在壓克燈箱下透露出一種藝術家的美德,因為這一些光源是間接的散發出來,造成一種不可思議微妙浮動顏色、型態,環境創造出明及沒限制性的觀念,引領我們進一種觀。在這一系列作品中她並刻意的去創造出一種格,她的格就是她自寫照
在作品中,片片花瓣常精緻層層相疊現出柔與麗,這些被種明的體中,直覺到花爭艷與引誘印象,用在議題上,從看起來,似乎無關,但或許仍究其珮淳作品中發的可能性。珮淳長的時間於議題上,經常取用中化的例及象去表達一個事件,或許這一,可以解使在她的作品中。她的玫瑰花瓣片片,引發一種慾望及一種國風情,這些現出一種解及一種平;一種來自人合成的物質,並植入幾何型態的物體的,她們是這不真實及如來自外星不明體。
珮淳的作品不僅僅追求視覺態,在「捕捉」這一件間的作品中,她並體的視覺象,她使3 D蝴蝶影在暗室中,創造出戲劇性的燈光,以及蝴蝶緩慢翅膀飛舞境。在這一間暗室中,然觀者這是一個非真實自然象,但他們不會去這一種視的象,這一種半信半疑的態度引發了動手這一些蝴蝶的反應,觸到這一些像,在間,理解了這是原來是一種象,但卻已,所以了一種有所感。 這件作品成為一種對人性的測試,這蝴蝶了對美的賞析以及自我對界的混亂僅是我們心的 一種不衡,些環我們的物體僅不過是感操縱數。
宇宙出人類的理解,反的,我們的是在人類的理智下構。 所以,人類如層次,以及不尊崇我們視覺以的世界,法體會人類在的。在這世界少去談到藝術應預言
性的,也就是藝術可以直接的表達秘密,這一個秘密並不他個人的秘密,而是藝術家扮演體的代言者,去表達這一個神秘性。在這世界少有一個體可以完全直接的了解什麼在他們的心中,所以觀察及多數的體就發現多數人是在自我欺騙的一種境中;許多的先不斷的告一個教訓就是無知即,而只有一個方法去解決這一種無知,就是過藝術,藝術是治療生病性的良藥。現藝術的運參與了自我的解構,這一種包含了藝術對於再生具相當力的法。
珮淳的作品反應了藝術家的宗教意識以及人文思想,她有直接並且邏輯性的跟隨一種對於新世界覺的敏度,表達了她的預言警告性格,經藝術的解讀達成她的任務及理,並且貢獻她在熱切度。去了解她的作品,我們不可以視藝術家的生活經驗及背景珮淳一種堅毅的性格,強烈的力,以及慈悲,她心人類的前,以及世人的生命,她不斷的在不可能中出一種可能性。
合了及視覺的現方安置色情境,從到消費主義,她的系列作品構了一個境,花筒式的多及變幾何圖象,組合了人的材,間接的質了我們的生活態度及會的構,在一種自然的間中觀者去接她,但現出一種距離而不可捉摸
不論珮淳藝術現是多的不規律或是有呈現明顯的愛好傾向,藝術對於是心的力,不論的藝術現如的解構或是顯粗略,以及追求的感覺,珮淳更重視德及心,我們更藝術原創化了所有的明,不論是藝術如哲學政權,但去的感情緒形象一直是藝術家圖目,創造力滋潤將會是新寶藏基礎